Total Pageviews

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Alienation

I'm a pretty alienated guy. And, sad to say, I feel most profoundly alienated from the Church. I have to say, I go through spurts of this. They happen most often right after I receive The Record, our Archdiocesan news weekly.

This week is an especially alienating edition. It's got stories about two new parishes. Such hopeful progress as we move to the future: Two parishes created by consolidating in one case, five existing parishes and building a new church for them, and consolidating three parishes in the other case.

I'm especially appalled by the latter. Three parishes in the Portland neighborhood are being consolidated into one, to be known as Good Shepard. How ironic. If we had had good pastoral care, these three parishes would still be viable. It was through a misplaced "pastoral spirit" that young men decided they weren't going to consider the priesthood--a hard drinking bishop who supports gay clergy men can have that effect on a young man. And even more telling, the decline in the attendance of these parishes shows the failure of both pastoral ministry, and the will to preach the gospel to all nations.

Portland is a neighborhood affected by what's referred to as demographic change. It went from being a white working class neighborhood, to a largely black neighborhood of lower and underclass people. Instead of honoring our own Church's teaching about a preferential option for the poor, we abandoned the neighborhood to all practical intents. The crime rate went up. that goes hand in hand with poverty. But we didn't try to convert the new residents. There was no real effort to evangelize them, to convert them to Catholicism. In effect, the liberal, progressive forces of our Archdiocese (Which our current ordinary is trying to correct) cut and ran.

Imagine the difference it could have made, if funds that went into building bland, mall like suburban churches and paying off the families and victims of abusive priests, had been used to keep the schools and parishes viable? How much difference would some low-cost or no cost Catholic Schools, with their proven superiority to Louisville public schools, have made to lives of hundreds, thousands, of kids in these neighborhoods? Imagine in a systematic effort had been made to evangelize the people living there, to create a core of people with good and firm moral values?

But no, they were poor, and we were enthusiastically embracing our post-war affluence. They were black, and we were white. And now, no matter how you dress it up, the church is losing even more ability to influence and help this neighborhood.

How did we ever trade our heritage of Apostolic Teaching, Missionary Outreach, Sacramental Ministry and Spiritual care for bland suburban conformity and ineffectual expressions of what ever is trendy? Sometimes I think it's time to swim the Bosporus, but then I wouldn't be in union with the Holy See, and I don't see them doing any better.


And then again, it's the annual graduation issue of the paper. I looked. I read. I came away saddened. It was amazing to me how the graduates of the major "Catholic" high schools carried themselves. In effect, they looked like frat boys and sorority girls in training. By dress, deportment, by everything I could see, they had bought into, not the counter cultural values of a genuine Catholicism, but mainstream American culture, with all it's shallowness and materialism, it's conformity and cowardice.

How did a radical, distributist, magisterial Catholic redneck like me fall into such a bourgeoisie church?

More importantly, how did we convince ourselves that mainstream acceptability and affluence were more valuable than our identity as Catholics first?

8 comments:

Kathy said...

Well said Redneck. I feel like you most days and wonder what my role is supposed to be in reforming this mess.

Elizabeth said...

If ya figure it out, let me know...

Subvet said...

"More importantly, how did we convince ourselves that mainstream acceptability and affluence were more valuable than our identity as Catholics first?"

For the answer to that one, climb into your handy-dandy time machine and travel back to a time when Catholics started yearning to "fit in". I'm fairly poor at history but I'd put the era as pre JFK.

My reasoning for this follows these lines; we hear a lot of hype & hyperbole about the problems arising from Vatican II. Those problems didn't spring full grown onto the scene just because of a meeting in Rome. When those senior clerics who were hungry for "change" saw the chance they jumped for it. I mention senior clerics because it was the bishops of that time who gave the formal okey-dokey that has led to a lot of abuses we now decry.

Their desire for "change" (and isn't it funny how thats becoming a distasteful word?) was nurtured for decades prior to the 60's. So the causes of our present problems go way back.

I mentioned JFK specifically because he epitomized the lack of spine in Catholics of his time. Publicly pledging not to let his beliefs intefere with his Presidential duties was fairly craven, yet the USA Catholics as a whole didn't blink an eye on it. They wanted their boy in the White House and those pesky problems inherent with following Catholic teaching would just have to take a backseat. Noted.

Sorry to rant on, this is a sore spot with me. To this day when I see pictures of JFK in the homes of devout Catholics I want to vomit. Our parents and grandparents of "The Greatest Generation" sold their Catholic heritage for a bowl of bean soup. Everything that followed afterwards was just the natural outcome of it.

Now we're trying to pick up the pieces.

La gallina said...

If it's any comfort, I've got similar issues with my parish.

I cried out to God this afternoon, "Why can't I have a priest who gives a crap??!!" But despite the million and one reasons to give up on my church, I know I have to continue stubbornly on. I could never give up the Eucharist or my loyalty to the Holy See.

I hope you don't give up on blogging! We need you. (Getcherself the cheap laptop -- PLEASE!)Somehow it's comforting to know I'm not alone in this spiritual wasteland.

Adrienne said...

I know exactly how you feel. The days of priests telling us that the changes in the church were due to societal changes ie: 60's hippies. blah, blah, blah are over!

Vatican II was a failed experiment. Today we went to Mass at a FSSP Chapel in our diocese, and the difference is so remarkable that it takes your breath away. Well behaved children, liturgy that is reverent and prayerful, and, best of all, an ORGAN. No crappy strumming guitar or bongos...

There are times when I wonder why anyone remains Catholic...

Dymphna said...

I remain Catholic because their is nothing else. The Orthodox have better looking churches, the Episcopalians have better music and the Baptists are friendlier but really, where am I going if Jesus is not present?

Joe of St. Thérèse said...

No Eucharist, No Peter everywhere else, that's why I'm here.

I get frustrated very quickly, Sometimes I wonder why the older generation threw such great things to the garbage, thanks for nothing Vatican II

Anonymous said...

Dear Redneck: I share you temptation to despair. But then I look at places like Christendom College, St. Thomas Aquinas, and our own parish here in Indiana. In our town we have 24 hour Perpetual Adoration and it has made all the difference. Not all of our parishes are truly orthodox.....some are appalling....but we have at least one parish that celebrates the Mass with reverence, has Eucharistic processions, and First Friday Adoration.....not to mention all of the other wonderful Catholic feasts. We worship Our Lord in the Eucharist and then we celebrate with joy and food and wine! You are correct in saying the Vatican II was a horribly mistaken experiment...but I see hope on the horizon. A smaller, but more faithful Catholic Church. St. Michael, pray for us!